BEGINNER FAQ

Q1. What forms does GelMA come in and what are they for?
  • Solid GelMA

    • Typically a lyophilized (freeze-dried) white foam/powder.

    • Long-term storage, shipping, and easy weighing.

  • Liquid GelMA solution

    • GelMA dissolved in aqueous buffer (commonly PBS) at a defined w/v % (e.g., 5–15%).

    • Used directly for casting, coating, or as a bioink for bioprinting once photoinitiator is added.

Q2. How do I store GelMA in solid and liquid form?
  • Solid (lyophilized) GelMA

    • Keep dry, protected from light, tightly capped.

    • Store at room temperature or 4°C; avoid humidity to prevent clumping and degradation.

  • Liquid GelMA (no cells)

    • Short term (hours–2 days): 4°C (it will gel at low temp; re-melt at 37°C to use).

    • Longer term: –20°C or below, aliquoted, then thawed as needed.

  • Cell-laden GelMA

    • Keep in the incubator (37°C, 5% CO₂) after crosslinking and medium exchange.

Q3. How do I turn solid GelMA into a usable liquid solution?

A simple, paper-aligned recipe:

  1. Weigh solid GelMA

    • Typical working range: 5–15% (w/v) in PBS or cell culture medium.

    • The paper uses 10% (w/v) GelMA extensively as a standard bioink.

  2. Dissolve

    • Warm buffer/medium to 37–50°C.

    • Add GelMA slowly while stirring until fully clear (no visible particles).

  3. Add photoinitiator

    • In the study, LAP (Lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate) at 0.5% (w/v) was used for UV (365 nm) crosslinking.

  4. Filter sterilize if needed

    • Pass through 0.22 µm filter while warm (for acellular use).

Now you have a liquid GelMA stock that can be used for casting or loaded into a cartridge for printing.

Q4. What basic temperatures should I think about for GelMA?
  • 37–40°C:

    • GelMA is fully liquid, easy to pipette and mix with cells or factors.

  • ~15–25°C (room–cooled):

    • GelMA starts to gel physically (coil → triple-helix transitions), increasing viscosity and stabilizing filaments for printing.

  • <10°C:

    • For 10% GelMA, becomes too stiff to extrude (nozzle clogging / non-extrudable).

Q5. How do I make GelMA solid again after it has been melted?

GelMA is thermoresponsive:

  • If your GelMA solution solidifies in the fridge or on the bench:

    • Place the tube/syringe in a 37°C water bath.

    • Gently invert or stir until homogeneous.

  • This is reversible as long as you don’t overheat or over-expose to UV.

Q6. What’s the simplest way to crosslink GelMA?

For standard 3D hydrogels:

  1. Prepare GelMA + LAP at your desired concentration (e.g. 10% + 0.5% LAP).

  2. Pour or print into your mold or onto your substrate.

  3. Expose to UV 365 nm, ~10–18 mW/cm² for ~60 seconds (as in the paper), or adjust for your light source.

That’s your chemically crosslinked GelMA hydrogel.

⚙️ INTERMEDIATE FAQ – Printability, Temperature Windows & Cell Handling

Q7. What is the “two-step” (thermal + photo) crosslinking strategy and why should I care?

The paper uses a two-step crosslinking approach:

  1. Step 1 – Physical gelation (temperature-controlled)

    • Cooling the GelMA in the syringe (down to 10–17.5°C) forms triple-helix physical networks, increasing viscosity and filament stability.

  2. Step 2 – Chemical crosslinking (UV + LAP)

    • After extrusion, the structure is permanently fixed by UV-induced methacrylate crosslinking.

Why it matters:

  • Better filament formation and print fidelity before UV.

  • Tunable mechanical properties, porosity, and degradation via extrusion temperature history.

Q8. What GelMA concentrations and temperatures print well?

From the paper’s systematic printability study (5, 10, 15% GelMA; 5–RT °C; 260 µm nozzle):

  • <10°C:

    • All concentrations (5, 10, 15%) → mostly non-extrudable or severely clogged.

  • 5% GelMA

    • 10–12.5°C → irregular, unstable filaments.

    • 15°C → can form filaments, but they lose integrity on the collector and bleed at higher temps.

    • 17.5°C → too liquid; strong bleeding.

  • 10% GelMA (sweet spot in this system)

    • 10°C → thin but less consistent filament.

    • 12.5°C → lumpy/unstable.

    • 15°C → “printable”: uniform filaments, good structural integrity, moderate width (~500–680 µm from a 260 µm nozzle).

    • 17.5°C → more irregular deposition, some bleeding.

    • Room temp (~22°C) → bleeding and poor fidelity.

  • 15% GelMA

    • Severe clogging at low temperatures; irregular filaments even at higher temps.

Practical takeaway:
For extrusion bioprinting using 10% GelMA in a setup similar to the paper:

  • Aim for syringe temperature ≈ 15°C to balance:

    • Extrudability

    • Filament uniformity

    • Reasonable fidelity without extreme stiffness

Q9. How does extrusion temperature affect mechanical properties & porosity?

For 10% GelMA extruded at different temperatures then UV-crosslinked:

  • As extrusion temperature decreases, you get:

    • Higher stiffness (E1 from ~21 kPa at RT to ~89 kPa at 10°C).

    • Higher viscosity parameter (µ) – more viscoelastic resistance.

    • Higher storage modulus (G′) – more elastic behavior.

    • Smaller pores & lower porosity

      • Pore size shrinks from ~480–640 µm at RT to ~7–19 µm at 10–12.5°C.

      • Porosity drops from ~50% (bulk) to ~0.2% at 10°C.

    • Lower swelling ratios

      • From ~11 (bulk) down to ~2–3 at 10–12.5°C.

So, colder extrusion → denser, stiffer, less swelling, slower-degrading hydrogel.

Q10. How does extrusion temperature affect degradation?

In collagenase II (10 U/mL) over 7 days, 10% GelMA showed:

  • Bulk / RT-extruded samples → almost fully degraded within ~48 hours.

  • 17.5°C / 15°C extruded → degraded ~93% / 87% by day 7.

  • 12.5°C / 10°C extruded → only ~25% / 13% degraded after 7 days.

Rule of thumb:

  • Higher extrusion temperature → faster degradation.

  • Lower extrusion temperature → more stable scaffold (denser network, fewer unreacted C=C bonds, deeper crosslinking).

Q11. What about cell viability in cell-laden GelMA?

Using human dermal fibroblasts in 10% GelMA + 0.5% LAP, printed at different temperatures then UV-crosslinked:

  • Non-extruded GelMA (just encapsulated + UV)

    • ~97% viable at 1 h, ~79–82% at 24 h.

  • Extruded at room temperature

    • ~80% viable at 1 h, ~76% at 24 h.

  • Extruded at 17.5°C & 15°C

    • ~73–77% viable at 24 h (moderate drop vs control).

  • Extruded at 12.5°C & 10°C

    • Severe viability loss: down to ~9–14% viable cells at 24 h.

Interpretation:

  • Extrusion itself (shear) reduces viability somewhat.

  • Very low extrusion temperatures (≤12.5°C) → high shear & ultra-dense networks → poor cell survival.

Practical sweet spot for cell-laden extrusion in this system:

  • 10% GelMA with syringe temperature ~15–17.5°C:

    • Good printability and acceptable cell viability.

Q12. How should I mix cells into GelMA in practice?
  1. Warm GelMA + LAP to ~37°C so it is fully liquid.

  2. Spin down and resuspend cells to desired density (e.g. 5×10⁵ cells/mL in the study).

  3. Gently mix cells into GelMA using a wide-bore pipette or slow swirling.

  4. Load into a pre-warmed syringe, then cool the syringe to your target extrusion temperature (e.g. 15°C).

  5. Print quickly and crosslink, then add fresh medium.

Keep the time that cells spend in the high-viscosity, cooled state as short as possible to reduce shear damage.

🧪 ADVANCED FAQ – Fine-Tuning Print Fidelity, Temperature, and Structure

Q13. What nozzle and surface conditions improve filament quality?

The paper systematically investigates nozzle hydrophobicity and substrate contact angle with CFD modeling and experiments:

  • Hydrophobic nozzle (silanized metal, contact angle ≈ 119–160°)

    • Reduces adhesion of GelMA to the nozzle.

    • Produces thinner, more uniform jets (diameter ~11–12% smaller than hydrophilic nozzle across velocities).

    • Increases jet velocity by up to ~20–40% at higher viscosities.

  • Substrate contact angle ~110° (moderately hydrophobic stage)

    • Provides better print fidelity (good symmetry, limited spreading).

    • Too hydrophilic (10–60°): excessive spreading and larger printed area.

    • Too hydrophobic (160°): unstable lamella, poor support for additional layers.

Takeaway for advanced users:

  • Use silanized (hydrophobic) nozzles and tune your stage coatings towards ~90–110° contact angle for best filament control.

Q14. How does temperature influence crosslinking chemistry (CD, DSC, FTIR insights)?

Key physicochemical findings:

  • Circular Dichroism (CD)

    • Shows formation of triple helices at lower temperatures for both gelatin and GelMA.

    • These helices support reversible physical gelation (thermal step).

  • Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

    • Gelation transition for GelMA solution around ~15°C (vs ~20°C for gelatin).

    • Confirms temperature-dependent coil → helix transition.

  • FTIR

    • Shoulder peak at ~1640 cm⁻¹ (unreacted C=C bonds) progressively disappears at lower extrusion temperatures, and is essentially gone at 10°C.

    • Indicates higher crosslinking density (fewer unreacted methacrylate groups) when printing at lower temperatures.

Design implication:

  • Lower extrusion temperature → more physical pre-ordering → deeper/more complete photopolymerization → stiffer, more stable network.

Q15. How can I deliberately tune stiffness, porosity and degradation using extrusion temperature?

For 10% GelMA + 0.5% LAP (you can generalize the trends to similar systems):

  • If you want soft, porous, faster-degrading hydrogels:

    • Use higher extrusion temperatures / simple casting near room temperature.

    • Expect larger pores (~400–600 µm), higher swelling, faster enzymatic breakdown.

  • If you want stiff, dense, slow-degrading scaffolds:

    • Use colder extrusion (e.g., 12.5–15°C).

    • Smaller pores, reduced swelling, slower degradation.

    • Be careful with cells below ~15°C due to viability drop.

  • If you want extreme alignment or anisotropic structures:

    • At 10–12.5°C, SEM shows elongated, worm-like pore structures and aligned wrinkles, potentially useful for vascular or neural guidance.

    • But cell viability is poor at these conditions; better suited for acellular or post-seeded scaffolds.

Q16. How does this translate into concrete “recipes” for different applications?

Example 1 – Cell-laden soft tissue model (e.g., dermal, generic soft tissue)

  • 10% GelMA + 0.5% LAP.

  • Syringe: 15–17.5°C.

  • Nozzle: hydrophobic, ~260 µm.

  • UV: 365 nm, ~1 min at ~10–18 mW/cm².

  • Expected: good printability, moderate stiffness, cell viability >70% at 24 h.

Example 2 – Long-lasting, stiff scaffold (acellular or post-seeded)

  • 10–15% GelMA + 0.5% LAP.

  • Syringe: 12.5–15°C (or even 10°C if your system can extrude it).

  • Same UV conditions.

  • Expected: dense network, small pores, low swelling, very slow degradation and high modulus; less suitable for direct in-nozzle cell encapsulation.

Example 3 – Fast-degrading, highly porous matrix (e.g., for rapid remodeling)

  • 5–10% GelMA; extrusion at room temperature or gentle casting.

  • Lower crosslinking density and larger pores; will degrade rapidly in protease-rich environments.

Q17. How does degree of methacrylation (DoM) interact with all this?

The paper used GelMA with ~72–76% methacrylation (measured by ¹H NMR), which gives a fairly high density of photocrosslinkable groups.

  • Higher DoM → more crosslinking potential → amplifies the effect of low-temperature extrusion (very stiff, dense gels).

  • Lower DoM → softer, more degradable gels; temperature tuning still works but with a narrower stiffness range.

For an advanced product line, you can combine DoM control + extrusion temperature to create a matrix of formulations covering very soft/fast-degrading to very stiff/slow-degrading, all using the same basic chemistry.

Getting Started with GelMA

Peer-Reviewed Papers

GelMA

Role of temperature on bio-printability of gelatin methacryloyl bioink in two-step cross-linking strategy for tissue engineering applications

M Janmaleki, J Liu, M Kamkar, M Azarmanesh, U Sundararaj, AS Nezhad Biomedical Materials 16 (1), 015021

Covalently cross‐linked hydrogels: Mechanisms of nonlinear viscoelasticity

M Kamkar*, M Janmaleki*, E Erfanian, A Sanati‐Nezhad, U SundararajThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering

Engineering a 3D Human Intracranial Aneurysm Model using Liquid-Assisted Injection Molding and Tuned Hydrogels

KW Yong*, M Janmaleki*, M Pachenari, AP Mitha, A Sanati-Nezhad, ...Acta Biomaterialia

A tuned gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogel facilitates myelination of dorsal root ganglia neurons in vitro

S Shahidi*, M Janmaleki*, S Riaz, AS Nezhad, N Syed Materials Science and Engineering: C, 112131

Viscoelastic behavior of covalently crosslinked hydrogels under large shear deformations: An approach to eliminate wall slip

M Kamkar*, M Janmaleki*, E Erfanian, A Sanati-Nezhad, U Sundararaj Physics of Fluids 33 (4), 041702

Microfluidics

Double emulsion formation through hierarchical flow-focusing microchannel

M Azarmanesh, M Farhadi, P Azizian Physics of Fluids 28 (3)

Passive microinjection within high-throughput microfluidics for controlled actuation of droplets and cells

M Azarmanesh, M Dejam, P Azizian, G Yesiloz, AA Mohamad, ...
Scientific reports 9 (1), 6723

Electrohydrodynamic formation of single and double emulsions for low interfacial tension multiphase systems within microfluidics

P Azizian, M Azarmanesh, M Dejam, M Mohammadi, M Shamsi, ...
Chemical Engineering Science 195, 201-207

Engineering shelf-stable coating for microfluidic organ-on-a-chip using bioinspired catecholamine polymers

S Khetani, KW Yong, V Ozhukil Kollath, E Eastick, M Azarmanesh, ...
ACS applied materials & interfaces 12 (6), 6910-6923

The effect of weak-inertia on droplet formation phenomena in T-junction microchannel

M Azarmanesh, M Farhadi Meccanica

Rapid and highly controlled generation of monodisperse multiple emulsions via a one-step hybrid microfluidic device

M Azarmanesh, S Bawazeer, AA Mohamad, A Sanati-Nezhad
Scientific reports 9 (1), 12694

Simulation of the double emulsion formation through a hierarchical T-junction microchannel

M Azarmanesh, M Farhadi, P Azizian. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow 25 (7

Picoliter agar droplet breakup in microfluidics meets microbiology application: numerical and experimental approaches

A Khater, O Abdelrehim, M Mohammadi, M Azarmanesh, M Janmaleki, ...Lab on a Chip 20 (12), 2175-2187

Rapid and Highly Controlled Generation of Multiple Emulsions via a Hybrid Microfluidic Device

M Azarmanesh. University of Calgary, PhD Thesis

IVF - High-Throughput Invitro Fertilization

Passive microinjection within high-throughput microfluidics for controlled actuation of droplets and cells

M Azarmanesh, M Dejam, P Azizian, G Yesiloz, AA Mohamad, ... Scientific reports 9 (1), 6723